evoluce

‘Genetics has no proofs for evolution. It has trouble explaining it. The closer one looks at the evidence for evolution the less one finds of substance. In fact the theory keeps on postulating evidence, and failing to find it, moves on to other postulates (fossil missing links, natural selection of improved forms, positive mutations, molecular phylogenetic sequences, etc.). This is not science.’

Professor Maciej Giertych, B.A., M.A. Oxon, Ph.D. Toronto, D.Sc. Poznan, Head of Genetics Department, Polish Academy of Scienced, Institute of Dendrology, Poland.

Re: evoluce

Intelligent design on the other hand is even more clueless in explaining genetics. So you have Intelligent Design theory that doesn´t work at all and Evolution that has issues. Nevertheless as a scientist you are bound to go with the latter, I´m afraid !!!

?

‘I myself am convinced that the theory of evolution, especially the extent to which it’s been applied, will be one of the great jokes in the history books of the future. Posterity will marvel that so very flimsy and dubious an hypothesis could be accepted with the incredible credulity that it has.

Malcolm Muggeridge

Re: ?

An yet it still holds more water than your pet theory of Big ol´bearded guy making all happen!

1!

Táž zjištění lze interpretovat i jinak. Ani v té pustině samotná hyperaktivita není výhodou, ba právě naopak. Vždyť-aby se udržela- musí být kombinována s větší svalovou silou.

Re: 1!

Znamena take vetsi vydej energie. Neverim, ze je to pro ty podvyzivene nejaka vyhoda, ktera by se evolucne projevila.