The children of Paul Emery Washington think of their father as an unpretentious, generous guy who climbed the corporate ladder to become regional manager at CertainTeed manufacturing, a building-supply company. Now 82, he takes care of his wife, who suffers from Alzheimer‘s disease, while spending time on the San Antonio, Texas, property that he shares with his children. “I think he would‘ve been a great king,Ž says son Bill Washington- a statement that might seem a little odd. Except that Paul Emery Washington is a direct descendant of George Washington, the nation‘s first president and perhaps the only man in history who turned down the position of monarch.
Had George Washington ascended to the throne, Paul Emery Washington could now go by King Paul, the first. Lore has it that President Washington was so well liked after his Revolutionary victory that a group of citizens frustrated with the Continental Congress floated the idea of a coup-d‘etat and the installation of King George and the creation of an American monarchy. But Washington, who believed that anyone might make for a good leader, staunched the idea and eventually relinquished his power as commanderin-chief.
8,000 descendants Since then, genealogists have been pondering the possibilities had President Washington been a bit more power-hungry. As early as 1908, newspapers published accounts of history buffs who worked their way through the Washington family tree using rules of succession to determine the rightful heir to the theoretical American throne. But without the Internet, branches of the Washington tree would be lost or forgotten because Washington himself didn‘t have any children.
But while brainstorming ideas for their election-themed coverage, Ancestry.comturned to their Chief Family Historian, Megan Smolenyak, for an answer to the historical mystery. Smolenyak first turned to Google where she figured out that, because kinship rules vary by country and because Washington was childless, there were four possible kings (or queens) among the nearly 8,000 descendants of Washington who are alive today. Of the 200 men that carry the Washington name, though, Paul Emery is the end result of two lines--a rare possibility that makes him the likely heir. That‘s a concept that Paul would rather not think about. “I doubt if I‘d be a very good king,Ž he says. “We‘ve done so well as a country without a king, so I think George made the best decision.Ž His family, which includes three sons and one daughter, are fifth-generation descendants of George‘s oldest brother, Samuel. But Paul would‘ve been the ninth or tenth king of America depending on which of the lines you follow. “A guy would get the crown and then live forever, or have no children, or just have a girl and that would send the crown careening across the family tree,Ž Smolenyak says of the lineage.
Lost king She concluded that leadership would have passed not to men named Abraham or Teddy but to those named Lee, Felix or Frank. “We would have had a King named Spot, how cool is that?Ž Smolenyak muses of the son who would‘ve fallen between King Bushrod, the first, and Bushrod II. And term limits? Not so much: King Larry would have been in power from 1935 to 1997, she says.
Many historians question the legitimacy of the King George myth, especially since most royals endure stricter marriage restrictions than the ones faced by today‘s Washingtons. And even among Paul‘s own children, there is varying skepticism. Richard, the eldest heir, has little interest in his supposed birthright while his younger brother, Bill, fills the upstairs floor of his home with George Washington memorabilia- paintings, coins, tobacco tins- and claims membership in the Sons of the American Revolution. Paul Emery‘s family has known for some time that they are descendants of America‘s first president, but Ancestry.com has used the latest technology to make a definitive case for Paul being the “lost king.Ž
Newsweek
